Let us look at a three dimensional object. For example, since our aim is to understand the image on the Shroud, look at this beautiful statue of Christ. When it is illuminated by a light source, each point on its surface can be characterised by (among other things) the intensity of the light that is reflected, and the colour (wavelength) of that reflected light. These parameters are governed by the surface characteristics at each point illuminated, e.g., ability to reflect or absorb light, angle made with the incident light, colour, surface material, and to a much smaller extent, the distance from the light source. The observed pattern of the lights and shadows and colours will give an impression of relief. If you move the source of light, the luminosity of each point varies, and so does the appearance of the object.
If we take a photograph of this object, we obtain, on a flat plane (a piece of paper), a pattern of colours and of light and dark areas. For a familiar subject, a human face or body for example, the human eye and brain processes this data into an imagined three dimensional model. Yet in reality the image is two dimensional on paper, and if we wanted, by the use of any mathematical formula, to convert the variations in brightness, contrast, and colour of each point in the photo into variations in the distance of each part of the object from the camera, we would get a mess, a completely distorted representation of the object (For example, a bright nose might be projected forward, but black eyebrows might be shown as several metres behind the head). But this is one of the marvels of the Turin Shroud. At the beginning of the 20th century, Gabriel Quidor, a French sculptor, had the intuition that the darker areas of the image did not correspond to shadows such as we might expect to find -- for example on this photo of Christ crucified. He began to suspect that with the Shroud, the degree of darkness really could be related to the distance that had once separated it from the body that it contained. Despite the rudimentary means at his disposal at the time (1923), he measured the degree of lightness or darkness at hundreds of critical points, developed a complex formula to convert these readings to distances, and then, transposed those distances above and below a base line to obtain a three dimensional representation of the face of the man in the Shroud. (see below on the left) In 1974, Paul Gastineau took up this idea and succeeded in making a model of the face. Then came the age of computers, with their phenomenal data processing capability. In the USA, Jackson and Jumper, using NASA's computers, confirmed the existence of this mathematical relationship, and obtained a very convincing three dimensional picture (see below, centre). The data provided by the computer was then taken by some cadets at an American air force academy who built a three dimensional model of the front part of the man in the Shroud. (see below, right). It is fascinating, but predictable, to note that they could never get any acceptable results when working from a photograph of any other object. Thus, to sum up so far, these researchers were able to find a mathematical relationship between the optical characteristics of each point on the Shroud, and a distance which corresponded exactly to that between the Shroud and the corpse that it contained. It is this unique particularity which has been called the tridimensionality of the image. |
3D representation obtained by Gabriel QUIDOR (The holy Shroud proves the death and resurrection of Christ) |
Image obtained on the screen of one of the computers at NASA |
"Statue" produced by the US air force cadets |
|
All this suggests that the
process which formed the image on the Shroud is not due to a source of energy, luminous or
otherwise, which was external to the corpse -- this would cause shadows, and therefore
very large distortions when the image is analysed mathematically -- but that it was an
internally sourced energy which came from the body itself. Apparently it is best described
as some sort of radiation or force, (whatever its exact nature), whose intensity decreased
according to the distance. However, far from bringing a solution to the problem, this
discovery only contributed an added mystery, the nature of this phenomenon. Note also, that the image of the Shroud is a photographic negative, (which inverts the values of the blacks and the whites). We can see this negative, below, left, alongside its corresponding positive image. Each point in the image has been analysed optically to give the graphic co-ordinates which have allowed the construction of the "volume" map, the model, or the three dimensional image. These discoveries have been impressive and convincing, and have converted many of the former advocates of the "Medieval fake" theory to believing today in the authenticity of the Shroud.
|
|
|
|